Thanks to the National Coalition for Men for raising awareness of The War on Male Students by posting links to the series at their national website, as well as the sites of several of their chapters. The president of NCFM, Harry Crouch, described the series on his website:
This must see, fair and balanced, pro-human, anti War on Men
video series should be shown in all appropriate school classes and age
groups. If you are reading this you have an opportunity to see it now.
Make sure everyone you know watches the series too. Doing so will help
reverse the anti-male attitudes and the War on Men in education
and elsewhere. The message of this series when distributed by viewers
will help reduce false accusations of rape, as well as false allegations
of other forms of violence, sexual and otherwise. This series shames
many who work in post secondary schools who allow ideology to drown
common sense and civility. Click on the picture to get started.
In other videos on rape
hysteria in education we discussed misandry by students. The time has come to
more closely examine the role of faculty and administrators in creating and
maintaining the culture of hostility toward male students in our education
system.
At Vassar College, two
male students were falsely accused of date rape. When they were found innocent,
the assistant dean of students Catherine Comins argued that men who are
unjustly accused can sometimes gain from the experience. Her argument is quoted
in an article by Nancy Gibbs in the June 2001 online edition of TIME magazine.
Comins says of the falsely accused, “They have a lot of pain,
but it is not a pain that I would necessarily have spared them. I think it
ideally initiates a process of self-exploration. 'How do I see women?' 'If I
didn't violate her, could I have?' 'Do I have the potential to do to her what
they say I did?' Those are good questions."
Let
us remember that an assistant dean of students is the administrator who either
adjudicates rape accusations, or presides over a panel consisting of faculty
and sometimes students who adjudicate rape accusations. If a male assistant
dean of students had suggested that women who are raped can gain from the
experience, and that it is not an experience he would necessarily have spared
them, how long would he have been an assistant dean of students? Male
professors and administrators have been forced by others in education to apologize,
or have been fired, for saying much less. But when Catherine Comins made the
statement that male students essentially deserve to be falsely accused of rape,
there was no outrage. There was no apology. There was nothing. It was one of
the many anti-male elements that the culture of higher education just passed
over as if nothing unexpected had happened.
From
the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), we hear this story:
[F]irst-year men at Hamilton College will be attending a mandatory
presentation of "She Fears You," a program
at which they will be pressed to acknowledge their personal complicity in a
"rape culture" on Hamilton's campus and to change their
"rape-supportive" beliefs and attitudes. First-year men were informed
via e-mail that attendance was
required and that they needed to bring their ID cards. "She Fears
You" will be presented by Keith Edwards,"a national
speaker and trainer on diversity and social justice and college men's issues
[which, by the way, Keith Edwards describes himself as on his website]."
"She Fears You" is based on the theory that men need a "combined cognitive and
emotional intervention" in order to change their "rape-supportive
beliefs." Attendees will be told that when they “make this an environment where it is no longer
acceptable in any way to objectify women or define masculinity as sexual
conquest, or subordinate women's intelligence, capability, and humanity, or
allow issues of racism, classism, and homophobia to go unabated, then this
campus will be a better place for all of us to be.”
Don’t be misled by Keith
Edward’s claim that he supports college men’s issues. As we can see, it is
clear that She Fears You is not about addressing the needs of male students as
a group, such as inequities concerning educational attainment:
Keith Edwards is part of what is called the pro-Feminist men’s
movement. It is the men’s auxiliary wing of the Feminism, which is primarily found
in academia.
First,
why the title She Fears You? Are male students as a group categorically deserving
of fear? Is any group categorically deserving of fear? It is also a
well-documented criminological fact that people of color tend to commit violent
crime, and in particular gang violence, at a higher rate than white people.
Would it then be right for our universities to declare that black students as a
group are categorically deserving of fear simply because they are black? What
if, instead of stopping male violence against women, our universities want to
stop violence black violence against white people by hosting an event titled
“Whites Fear You” and forcing only black students to attend? If you listen to the video, you will hear Edwards express regret over his humanity being taken away for being presumed a potential rapist simply for walking near women at night. But should his humanity
be taken away simply because he is male? Is it the responsibility of every male
student to prove that they are not rapists? Or - to use role reversal - is it
the responsibility of any given black person to prove that he or she is a “good
black person” unlike all those “other black people?”
This is the email from Hamilton College’s Dean of Students Nancy Thompson regarding
the event:
More than two weeks have passed since
Keith Edwards delivered his "She Fears You" presentation at Hamilton
College, yet Hamilton has still not responded to FIRE's letter requesting that
attendance be made voluntary. Nor has Hamilton made any public statement about
the event. (The event also wasn't filmed, so non-attendees will never know
exactly what Edwards said that night.)
We may never know whether Hamilton is
too embarrassed to explain whether it really believes there is a "rape
culture" on campus, or whether Hamilton is so arrogant as to choose not to
engage its critics. But thanks to Managing Editor for Commentary (and former FIRE
intern) J.P. Freire in
the Washington Examiner, we now have a better idea of
Edwards', shall we say, difficult to reconcile views on freedom of speech and
conscience.
We appreciate the fact that Edwards
took J.P.'s call. Edwards freely revealed that he usually charges $2,000 for a
"She Fears You" lecture, but depending upon demand for a longer
visit, that price could rise to $5,000 or even $10,000.
How
many of these lectures has Edwards given? On his website he gives a list of 60 colleges and universities. Since the list ends in 2010, it is also possible
that list might not be updated, and that there may be more. In
academia, where you make a living from promoting ideas, you can make misandry
into a career. As we recall from the blog post/video on the Duke lacrosse false rape case, when the group of 88 professors publicly signed a statement that presumed
the three male students guilty simply because they were male, professor KC Johnson told the story of a women's studies professor who claimed that she entered higher education because it gave her the opportunity to "explore the idea that women were superior and that a new world could be built on that superiority."
Beyond
asking what the presentation “She Fears You” says about Keith Edwards as an
individual, more importantly, what does it say about the culture of the
colleges and universities who not only gave it their stamp of approval, but
paid thousands of dollars for this kind of presentation? If they are buying what
he is selling, is the problem just Keith Edwards? And this is one thing that we
will repeatedly come back to, because it is so central to understanding and addressing
the systemic neglect and abuse of male students: the problem is not individuals
like Keith Edwards, or Catherine Comins, or Kathy Rudy, or the rest of the individuals
we will address in this series; the problem is the academic culture that
creates and supports them. And so long as we focus exclusively on individual
cases and fail to acknowledge that culture, we are missing the bigger picture.
Keith
Edwards is right about one thing: the widespread dehumanization of men and boys
is indeed a direct product of rape hysteria in our education system. [PLAY:]
“My humanity is damn important to me and I don’t know how to do that.” Where we
disagree is that Edwards believes in not only giving in to his own
dehumanization, but also teaching men and boys to do the same, while I believe
that the correct way is to assert your humanity by dissenting with the
perspective that men and boys are deserving of fear simply because they are
male.
If
this kind of presentation were directed toward any other group, our current
institutional champions of “diversity,” an ideological tribe of which Edwards
is a part, would have responded very differently. Instead of taking the message
at face value and asking “what is wrong with black people, or Hispanics, and so
forth, our universities would be asking the correct question: “what is wrong
with the culture of our educational institutions that we promote events
fostering prejudice and bigotry against our own students based upon their
membership in a particular genetic birth group? But they do not ask these
questions, which they would ask with any other group, because in the culture of
higher education, the system of moral checks and balances has broken down.
In
a facially lower-key presentation titled "Asking for it," professor Harry
Brod of the University of Northern Iowa states that (concerning consent in sexual matters) "just because there's no 'no' does not mean there is a 'yes.'"
So according
to Professor Brod, a woman who wants to have sex can nod her head, she can
wink, lick her lips, smile, grab a man’s penis and pull him into her, he can be
completely drunk and do nothing and she could be completely sober and make all
the initiating moves, but if she doesn’t specifically say “yes,” he’s a rapist.
This is not
the legal definition of sexual assault. This is an ideological and political
definition, under which I and many of my male friends are also rape victims.
His rationale is a lesson from his driver's ed instructor from over forty years ago: that consent is like the right-of-way that someone else gives you, and that you are not entitled to by default.
Beyond the obvious
problematic element that men and women are not cars and a woman’s vagina is not
a four-way intersection, there are other problems with his analogy – even if we
accept it as self-evident. For example, when drivers give others the right of
way, they do not rely on the other driver hearing their words, but by employing
a variety of gestures, many of which are non-verbal, such as flashing their
lights or using hand gestures – which is exactly what many people do when they
consent to sex, but do not necessarily say yes. Another problematic factor is
that when drivers approach intersections, many times they do not ask for or
give the right of way at all, but instead take turns based upon whether the signal
is green or red – another form of nonverbal communication.
His class was based on
personal agenda on his perception of men. Myself and others felt he attacked
men for being men, the class has little to do with masculinity as a whole. He
was most responsive to the women in the class speaking on men's issues solely
from a fem. perspective. Almost made men feel bad for being men. Very pompous
and not kind to men.
And another student commented, “Hates himself for being
male, and loves radical feminism… Can I please have at least one teacher who
doesn't have an agenda? Come on!”
The
hysteria concerning sexual assault on campus has reached such a fever pitch
that male students are now punished for promoting sexual violence for participating
in minor sexual humor that does not even involve women at all. Another reportby the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education tells us:
In April 2012, members of the men's crew team wore T-shirts at Tufts'
Spring Fling featuring a silhouette of a rowing team on a boat and the phrase
"check out our cox" (referring to a boat's coxswain [which is “a
sailor who has charge of a ship's boat and its crew and who usually steers”]). According to multiple accounts, several members were suspended from
the team after a bias incident report was submitted due to the shirt's content,
two senior captains were removed from their positions, and team members had to
write apology letters. The accounts reported a dean exerting disciplinary
pressure on the team, stating that the shirts promoted rape and aggression
toward women. Additionally, a confidential source reported to FIRE that Tufts'
rowing director ordered his assistants to choose a punishment, which he and the
dean's office would then approve.
The
details of this report can be confirmed by reading Tufts Daily, the
university’s student newspaper.
So
a shirt reading “check out our cox” promotes rape and aggression? It’s times
like these that I don’t have to make an argument. Our education system writes
the argument for me. Unfortunately, however, we are not halfway done discussing
rape hysteria by faculty and administrators. We will discuss more in the future.
